Scout's legal troubles are growing

Scout’s direct sales model is facing a growing wave of lawsuits across multiple states.

Feb 17, 2025 - 07:43

Scout Motors is finding itself in hot water even before delivering its first vehicle. The revived off-road brand, backed by Volkswagen Group, is facing mounting legal challenges from vehicle dealerships over its direct-to-consumer sales model. Lawsuits in Florida and opposition from California’s dealer association highlight the complex legal landscape Scout must navigate as it prepares to launch its Terra pickup truck and Traveler SUV.

Florida dealers file lawsuit

In Florida, a group of Volkswagen and Audi dealers has filed a lawsuit against Scout, arguing that the company is violating the state’s dealer franchise laws by accepting deposits for its vehicles. Under Florida law, even deposits are considered sales, and Scout has already secured over 50,000 of them.

The lawsuit further claims that Scout is a “common entity” of Volkswagen of America, which should prohibit it from bypassing traditional dealerships. The dealers are asking the state to halt Scout’s deposit collection and prevent it from selling directly in Florida. This case will likely set an important precedent, as Tesla and Rivian are already allowed to sell directly in the state, but they lack an established parent company with franchised dealers.

California dealers push back

Scout is also facing resistance in California, where the California New Car Dealers Association (CNCDA) has sent a cease-and-desist letter warning that the brand’s sales strategy violates a 2023 amendment to the state’s vehicle code. The amendment prevents automakers from competing with their own franchise dealerships, a rule aimed at maintaining the traditional dealer network.

Volkswagen and Scout argue that Scout operates independently, much like Tesla. However, the CNCDA disputes this, pointing to VW’s direct financial and operational backing, including funding Scout’s factory in South Carolina. If the dealers escalate their legal efforts, it could further delay Scout’s ability to sell vehicles in California.

A growing battle over direct sales

Dealer franchise laws vary widely across the U.S., creating legal hurdles for automakers attempting to sell vehicles directly. Some states, like South Carolina—where Scout’s factory is being built—prohibit direct-to-consumer sales outright. However, a bipartisan bill is being introduced to allow Scout to operate without dealerships in the state.

Scout’s legal troubles highlight a broader battle between traditional dealership networks and automakers seeking more control over their sales process. Tesla and Rivian have successfully avoided dealerships, but legacy brands like Volkswagen must work within a system that protects existing franchise agreements.

Final thoughts

Scout is positioning itself as a competitor to Rivian and Tesla, offering consumers an alternative to the dealership experience. However, if legal challenges prevent it from selling directly, the brand could face significant hurdles in attracting buyers who prefer to bypass dealerships.

For Volkswagen, the implications extend beyond Scout. If courts rule against the brand, it could limit other automakers from adopting direct sales models in the future. With lawsuits underway and legislative battles looming, Scout’s ability to navigate these legal challenges could shape the future of car sales in the U.S.

Love reading Autoblog? Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get exclusive articles, insider insights, and the latest updates delivered right to your inbox. Click here to sign up now!