![The American contingent and Turkey’s autonomy goals: Paris Air Show Day 3 [Video]](https://breakingdefense.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2025/06/Wednesday-Wrap.00_00_32_21.Still001.png?#)
![A look at the jets flying high above the Paris Air Show [PHOTOS]](https://breakingdefense.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2025/06/Rafale_02-scaled-e1750268097167.jpg?#)
Three Alternative Approaches to Deterrence in Europe and the Indo-Pacific
Whether the United States defines China as a global threat or a predominantly regional one will have pervasive implications for U.S. alliance and deterrence strategy in Europe and the Indo-Pacific. The second Trump and Biden administrations agree on a key fact: China constitutes the most serious and systemic challenge to U.S. power and interests. Yet, they seem to disagree on how to characterize the nature and scale of that challenge. Whereas the Biden administration construed China as a global challenge, the Trump administration regularly emphasizes the centrality of the China threat in the Indo-Pacific.Against this backdrop, President Donald Trump’s insistence The post Three Alternative Approaches to Deterrence in Europe and the Indo-Pacific appeared first on War on the Rocks.
Whether the United States defines China as a global threat or a predominantly regional one will have pervasive implications for U.S. alliance and deterrence strategy in Europe and the Indo-Pacific. The second Trump and Biden administrations agree on a key fact: China constitutes the most serious and systemic challenge to U.S. power and interests. Yet, they seem to disagree on how to characterize the nature and scale of that challenge. Whereas the Biden administration construed China as a global challenge, the Trump administration regularly emphasizes the centrality of the China threat in the Indo-Pacific.Against this backdrop, President Donald Trump’s insistence
The post Three Alternative Approaches to Deterrence in Europe and the Indo-Pacific appeared first on War on the Rocks.
