Biglaw Firms That Capitulated To Trump Reveal Deep Divide Between Corporate Lawyers And Litigators
That may be why litigators are leaving their firms while corporate lawyers are sticking around. The post Biglaw Firms That Capitulated To Trump Reveal Deep Divide Between Corporate Lawyers And Litigators appeared first on Above the Law.
Ed. note: Welcome to our daily feature, Quote of the Day.
Corporate lawyers in many of the top firms have more power when it comes to administrative decisions because they generate more revenue than most litigators. As a result, they may have played a bigger role in the decision to cooperate with the administration, leaving many litigators disgruntled to the point of looking for opportunities to leave the firm.
— Rebecca Roiphe, a legal ethics professor at New York Law School, in comments given to the American Lawyer, on the growing divide between corporate and litigation partners at the Biglaw firms that made pro bono payola deals with the Trump administration. A D.C. Biglaw partner who spoke anonymously with Am Law seemed to agree with Roiphe, saying, “The corporate lawyers have been driving the [Trump deals], to the great displeasure of many, if not most or all, of the litigators.”
Staci Zaretsky is a senior editor at Above the Law, where she’s worked since 2011. She’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to email her with any tips, questions, comments, or critiques. You can follow her on Bluesky, X/Twitter, and Threads, or connect with her on LinkedIn.
The post Biglaw Firms That Capitulated To Trump Reveal Deep Divide Between Corporate Lawyers And Litigators appeared first on Above the Law.
