New nuclear would be too late and too costly | Letter
Dr Paul Dorfman is sceptical about the new nuclear renaissanceThe new nuclear renaissance on which you report ((Tide is turning in Europe and beyond in favour of nuclear power, 1 June) may well turn out to be like the last frail one due to a set of inconvenient truths.The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports that renewables are now 10 times more efficient than new nuclear at CO2 mitigation; 92.5% of all new power capacity added worldwide in 2024 was from renewables, with new nuclear virtually nowhere; new nuclear builds are vastly over-cost and over-time; large reactors on offer are the same ones offered 25 years ago – no new designs have been developed this century; since all small modular reactors are in the design stage, industry forecasts must be treated with scepticism; and waste, proliferation and siting problems are all deeply unresolved. Continue reading...
Dr Paul Dorfman is sceptical about the new nuclear renaissance
The new nuclear renaissance on which you report ((Tide is turning in Europe and beyond in favour of nuclear power, 1 June) may well turn out to be like the last frail one due to a set of inconvenient truths.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports that renewables are now 10 times more efficient than new nuclear at CO2 mitigation; 92.5% of all new power capacity added worldwide in 2024 was from renewables, with new nuclear virtually nowhere; new nuclear builds are vastly over-cost and over-time; large reactors on offer are the same ones offered 25 years ago – no new designs have been developed this century; since all small modular reactors are in the design stage, industry forecasts must be treated with scepticism; and waste, proliferation and siting problems are all deeply unresolved. Continue reading...
